Saturday, October 19, 2013

Redesign My Brain

Redesign My Brain poster


A must watch for educators on ABC television at the moment is a new documentary series called Redesign My Brain. Hosted by Todd Sampson from the Gruen Transfer series, he undergoes a series of challenges to change his brain. The first episode last week was on memory and thinking skills while this week was all about creativity. While we may not all be scientists, the show holds a number of important lessons for all educators no matter what subject they teach.

One of the key ideas to come out of the first episode was the incredible ability of the brain to improve itself given the appropriate training. Over the course of a month, Sampson was able to significantly improve his memory, thinking speed and peripheral vision. Apart from a few specialised computer programs, this improvement mainly came about through the act of repetition and daily practice, such as juggling. In the end, he demonstrated the power of simply practicing these skills by memorising a complete deck of cards at the World Memory Championships.

While those of you who have seen or read about brain plasticity (see Norman Doidge’s The Brain That Changes Itself and Barbara Young’s The Woman Who Changed Her Brain) may not be surprised at such results, it is a good reminder of the power of this still largely mysterious human muscle. Moreover, it shows that whatever the age or profession that such transformations are possible.

Specifically though for educators, it is a reminder of the power of encouraging students to practice, practice, practice. This idea, as well as the general area of brain plasticity, was taught to me by my former head of department Brendan Sullivan. For a staff meeting one day he got us all to read an article from an American journal about labelling students as smart. I read the article a little begrudgingly, I generally didn’t like department meetings and extra reading didn’t seem like a good addition, but the information was eye opening. In particular, the notion that labelling a student clever can actually be dangerous to their education came as a surprise. However, the research showed that the label of clever or smart can lead to students avoiding challenges to avoid appearing to be dumb. Moreover, by encouraging students to try hard and persist in the face of adversity lead to improved results. The take home message was to never call students smart in class and it is something I have worked very hard at not doing ever since.

Later that year Brendan also introduced the department to the concept of growth mindset. Based on the work of Carol Dweck, it examined how different students approach challenging class work. The research suggested people can have either a fixed or growth mindset. People with a fixed mindset tend to avoid challenges, give up easily, see effort as wasted, ignore negative feedback and are threatened by the success of others. If this sounds like your top and bottom performing students then you are probably on the right track because this is the sort of thinking schools encourage. That is, by focusing on assessment and labelling students with grades, we subconsciously train kids to have a fixed mindset about the various subjects they do. For instance, I often avoid doing musical related tasks in class because I was ‘bad’ at music at school. Instead, I tend to avoid anything musical and don’t see much point in trying to learn a musical instrument. On the other hand, I was ‘good’ at maths at school so I don’t mind helping out in this area. Consequently, many students come into the classroom with fixed mindsets about their abilities in that subject. Are we then surprised that despite coming up with creative and interesting tasks they just don’t engage?

Dweck also identifies the growth mindset. People with this mindset will embrace challenges, persist in the face of setbacks, see effort as worthwhile, learn from criticism and find inspiration in the success of others. For instance, if I read a book and don’t quite get the meaning or the ideas then I will reread or do research until I do. I clearly have a growth mindset when it comes to English – luckily I am an English teacher! However, I have also tried to apply this to my other areas of interest such as rock climbing. I am not ashamed to admit I have only completed 1 climb so far in the year and a half I have been climbing but that doesn’t upset me. I know that every time I go out to a rock face that I am getting better. Moreover, I know that when I regularly practice in the climbing gyms and do my core exercises at home my climbing gets even better.

The problem is how to get students to think like this. Clearly it is not something they naturally do because we encourage them to do otherwise with our grading and reporting. To counter this I decided to teach my students this year about fixed and growth mindsets. This wasn’t content in any of the curricula I used or mandated by the schools but it was something I felt was important. Thus, I gave each student a diagram of the two mindsets and asked them, “Who here is good at English?” This allowed me to straight away get out my mantra of practice, practice, practice. Hence, I set the ground work early in all my classes: no one is good at English in my class but we can all work hard. Importantly, I make a point of recognising those who do work hard and seek help to improve. This can be as simple as noting publicly someone using a planner to improve a piece of writing or seeking help to understand something better. These are not big in themselves but they reinforce the idea that it is the effort and practice that count not some innate ability.

Finally, this idea led me to utilise what is known as Good Learning Behaviours (GLBs for short). This came from the PEEL research (http://www.peelweb.org/index.cfm?resource=good%20behaviours) and when used in conjunction with growth mindsets helps promote a great classroom environment. Importantly, it encourages students to take ownership of their own learning and seeks ways to improve. Thus, I also teach my classes GLBs at the beginning of every year. I take it a step further by giving each student the GLBs list and making them stick it in their record book so they can reference it easily in any class. And yes, once again I can praise students for seeking help and planning rather than simply being clever.


In conclusion, Redesign My Brain may not be ground breaking in the research uncovered or the ideas presented but it is a good reminder of the power of our own brains. Moreover, it highlights how much power we have to improve our own skills through practice and a growth mindset. I better stop typing now so I can do my juggling practice – never too old to learn some new tricks.

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

A Window into Shattered Lives

The problem of juvenile offenders is much more complex then "name and shame" Jarrod


Last week I wrote an open letter to Queensland attorney general Jarrod Bleijie about his proposed “name and shame” laws for juveniles in the Backwards, oops, Sunshine State. I posted that letter on this blog, tweeted the minister (@JarrodBleijieMP) and sent him an email with my full contact details so that he could get back to me. Unsurprisingly he hasn’t responded and probably with good reason: he has been roundly criticised for this ridiculous law. There was even an insightful and detailed article by educator Dan Haesler (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-27/haesler-name-and-shame-juveniles/4984188) pointing out not only the emotional impacts but the lack of a sound economic or statistical reason for the policy. Yes, he is introducing this law as juvenile repeat offender rates are decreasing – talk about creating a crisis in order to appear “tough”.

This issue came up again for me this week as I was watching an ABC2 documentary called Kids Behind Bars. The multi-part documentary looks at the worst juvenile offenders in detention in Britain. Each episode typically focuses on 3 children and gives their back stories as well as their journey through the detention centre. While at first I was shocked at the violence, language and attitude of these children, the documentary painted a convincing picture about what these kids really need.

One of the common aspects to all the subjects of the documentary was the dysfunctional home environment that they faced. While this was not always the fault of the parents, the carers and teachers at the centre spoke regularly about the need to set clear boundaries and expectations of behaviour. As they point out, why would the kids expect to get in trouble for hitting or swearing at a detention staff member if that sort of behaviour was condoned at home? Moreover, it was inspiring to see the transformation that the children underwent as they adapted to the routine of the detention centre and saw the benefits of regular education.

Another common aspect was the vulnerability that the juvenile offenders displayed. While it is easy to just see their violence and crime, the documentary showed that this is often the outer manifestations of deep seeded insecurities and that it is their way of seeking help. Often the carers and teachers in the detention centre are the first people to genuinely show care about the emotional wellbeing of the children and this can form the basis of their development as members of society.

The final key aspect for me was the role of education. Many of the staff commented that the detention centre was the first time many of the children had sustained classroom education. Being locked up they had little choice but to attend, however, once they started they quickly saw the benefits from improving their literacy and other skills. The show also demonstrated how these young criminals often had very low literacy levels and thus simplistic “name and shame” policies fail to recognise the importance of education to improving the chances of disadvantaged young people. In episode 2 it was particularly great to see how one of the very violent female offenders was able to get into college and used it as a way to escape the drugs and violence of her home in Wales.

Hopefully Jarrod Bleijie can take time out of his busy schedule locking up and embarrassing young people and watch an episode of this great documentary. By doing so he might gain an insight into the social conditions that lead to crime and not simply label juvenile offenders as never do wells. As the documentary shows, many juvenile offences are a result of society failing to properly care for and educate young people. While prison can sometimes provide the space for these young people to learn these skills and rehabilitate, it would be much smarter and cost efficient to ensure they get the help they need in the first place.

The Drum: Uninformed Nonsense on Education

An ill informed and poor source of debate on education


Tonight’s episode of The Drum on ABC24 is a classic example of what is wrong with the education debate within Australia. Hosted by former journalist Julia Baird, she asked the panel consisting of a politician, editor and ex-political advisor/journalist to comment on new Education Minister Christopher Pyne’s views about the need to review Australian history in schools.

Before we examine the issue, note the composition of the panel: they were all journalists and politicians. If they were to have a discussion about Iraq or Syria I’m sure they could locate an expert on Middle Eastern politics from a university and similarly a medical or technology expert on related matters. Come to think of it, I’m sure there are many teachers like myself or professors in education departments around Australia who would love to get that sort of air time. But no! This is only education after all and Julia’s reminiscence about an out dated history textbook are more than enough expertise to share around.

As such, the debate about the Australian history curriculum replayed old arguments about black arm band views on history with one panellist bemoaning the lack of Australian history in the Australian history curriculum. At least one of them had the decency to admit that he wasn’t an expert but he too had his input.

This is the core reason why education in Australia is going backwards and we are stuck in these old debates. Julia shouldn’t be looking at her textbook for out dated views: she should try the panel and her own views. Teachers are more professional and better trained than in the past and our history curriculum came about through a lengthy consultation process involving ACARA. Of course none of the guests could discuss this because the ABC couldn’t be bothered to get an actual expert on to discuss it. Instead, we have half-baked ideas from people who haven’t taught in a classroom or been a student in a high school classroom for a very long time.

If we want to have proper debates about education in Australia then get some educational experts in to discuss the matter. No one is saying that the history curriculum is perfect but please respect the PROFESSIONALISM and EXPERTISE of teachers by at least giving them primacy of opinion. While we continue to have educational debates run by rank amateurs like on the Drum then we will get nowhere. The attitude in Australia that teachers are not professional is only compounded by TV shows having such debates rather than seeking teacher input. It also makes our jobs that much harder because despite over 4 years of trainings, multiple post-graduate qualifications and more hours in a classroom than most of the people I speak to, almost all of them think they know as much about teaching as me.


Sorry to tell you Julia and the rest but YOU DON’T! When you come back with a teaching degree, have taught in a classroom for more than a few years and have worked full time in this demanding profession then feel free to lecture me on history curriculum and teaching. Until then, please treat me like the professional I am because I have the qualifications and experience to back up my opinion. Unlike you, who think common sense and “back in my day” arguments are better than research and practical experience, I know what I am talking about.